by: Matthew J.R. Kohler
Eye in the Sky is not your normal action film. To be honest, I don’t know if it even is an action film. However, it has traits that a good action film should have. This weekend, I got to watch Alan Rickman’s last major role, and I was not disappointed.
The movie doesn’t take long to set up. The main three characters, played by Helen Mirren, Aaron Paul, and Alan Rickman, are introduced and are defined within ten minutes. It also helps that the movie is only 100 minutes. Shorter running times often force the film to move straight into the conflict, rather than adding scenes that aren’t needed.
It has been a while since I have seen a small movie. What I mean by a small movie is that the scope of the movie only focuses on a small group of people in a specific, limited situation. It’s about a certain select people who are in danger, not the fate of the world. Overall, the conflict hinges on a little girl who is playing next to a house. There are armed suicide bombers are in the house, and her proximity to the house means she would die if an airborne drone were to strike at the terrorists. Who knew a movie can cut so deeply over a small problem? That’s what makes this movie intense. Not only can every human understand what the problem is, but you follow the little girl throughout the movie. This helps the conflict build as she becomes someone you want to see survive. How many times do you watch an action movie and feel emotional by the end? Not many.
In Eye in the Sky, the character’s personalities are shown through their decision making. Alan Rickman and Helen Mirren are strong leaders who will do whatever it takes to get the job done. Aaron Paul is a new pilot whose never experienced war, but follows orders. The rest of the government officials have most likely never experienced battle.
Helen Mirren, who has worked on the case surrounding these terrorists for six years, is fixated on getting the job done. Not only does she know what is at stake (the little girl’s life and the repercussions of the missile fire), but also she has a task to do, and she wants to prevent as many casualties as possible. I could never accomplish what Helen’s character did. But, I can see her point of view. In her mind it’s either one girl’s death (followed swiftly by a PR nightmare), or potentially watching eighty people get killed as a result of her failure to strike at the terrorists. On the other hand, the little girl has a face.
Giving the collateral damage a face makes the story more powerful. For example, in Star Wars, the audience cares a lot about Alderaan when it gets destroyed by the Death Star because we have seen and gotten to know Princess Leia, and understand how much her home means to her. Contrast this with the destruction of the Hosnian system in The Force Awakens. Because we know so little about those affected by the disaster (or might have missed the system’s name even mentioned), as an audience, our ability to sympathize is significantly lessened. Besides giving the girl a face, how the filmmakers showed her character, as a peaceful child who respected her elders and worked hard, was very effective. She was also innocent to the events happening above her.
As the film progresses, the stakes are continually increased. At first, the mission was one of capture, and suddenly it became shoot to kill. At this point, the situation gets more serious. The stakes do rise, and they make sense for the film. The opening scene sets up the little girl in the story too, so that the audience isn’t shocked that she is part of the conflict in the movie.
The final twenty minutes is gripping, but also ends it the best way possible. In the end, you leave with a lot of questions. Personally, I knew I could never do what these people do, but also realize that nobody should have to make those choices. But in this movie, the ending wisely keeps it clean. Yes, it is a serious topic, but it is tamed. What also helped me enjoy this movie was that it didn’t beat me over the head constantly with its point. Eye in the Sky is a great film; and in a world of huge blockbusters, it proves that less can be more . The story delivers from beginning to end. It is not the greatest movie of all time, but never tries to be.
+ The entire cast
+ Pacing of the film
+ Build up to the main conflict
+ Gives a lot to question after viewing
+ Ending is great
– Wish the end had a little more impact